This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: On alignment

Hi,

> Sounds like they noticed and worked around this bug.  Which makes me more
> inclined to go ahead and fix it.

Yes they did. 

Also,  this is why Darwin gcc3 alignment (and AIX it seems from David)) 
which has double aligned to 4 and long long int aligned to 8 throws off 
some of the OOo alignment tricks as well.

Will having long long int aligned to 8 and double aligned to 4 create any 
problems for gcj if a similar alignment macro is used for gcj given that 
doubles and long long int are different ?  Or am I off in the weeds here 
in my understanding  ... I often get confused by alignment of structures, 
size of structures, and the alignment and size of their largest member?

Kevin
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]