This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++: Why do we nreverse CLASSTYPE_TAGS

> OK, I'll experiment with that approach.  What threasold would you put
> for "lots"?

I dunno.  Probably 10 or so, to start.  With fewer than that, hashing
can't possibly be a win.  By the time you get to 100, I'm sure it will
be.
 
> Another case I'm thinking of is when set CLASSTYPE_TAGS with
> current_binding_level->tags, although I do not believe that would be a
> real obstacle.

Yes, that's a bit of complexity, but we should be able to lose that as
well.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark at codesourcery dot com
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]