Re: Loop Optimizer Deficiency revisited

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>]

On Monday, March 24, 2003, at 10:25  AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:

> > > > > > > > Zack Weinberg writes:
> > >
> > > Zack> However, it is likely to be addressed by completing the
> > store-motion
> > > Zack> pass, which has never worked properly.  If you would like
> > to help with
> > > Zack> that, talk to Daniel Berlin (cc:ed).
> > >
> > > 	I believe that Zdenek has a revised store-motion patch which has
> > > been waiting for approval.
> >
> > I don't consider myself competent to review that patch, but perhaps
> > Mr. Gupta could try it on his test case.
>
> Thanks for the pointers.
>
> I think you are talking about "[rtlopt] GCSE global variables removal"
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-09/msg01355.html

No, this is not the correct patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg02090.html is what you 
want.
>