This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- Cc: janis187 at us dot ibm dot com, richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de, mark at codesourcery dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 13:51:57 -0800
- Subject: Re: 3.3 compile time regression (22400%)
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303181300580.22005-100000@bellatrix.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303181300580.22005-100000@bellatrix.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen <1048340383.756.39.camel@steven>
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 02:39:43PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hi Janis, Richard,
>
> This is a regression but somehow there is no PR for it, and no test
> case. Isn't being able to compile POOMA a release requirement?
>
> Richard, can you open a PR for this issue and put that multi-megabyte
> test case up for download somewhere? If you don't have a public space
> for your test case, then I can make some of my own available for you.
>
> Janis, when the test case is there, do you have the cycles to track this
> one down to the breaking patch somehow?
Yes, I can do that.
Richard Guenther, if you can tell me explicitly how to set things up
using an existing POOMA tarball then I can do that instead of getting
the giant preprocessed source file (this is a one-time offer). I've
got the tarball that is referenced in
http://gcc.gnu.org/testing/testing-pooma.html.
Janis