This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC Infrastructure File

From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
Cc: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>, "Michael S. Zick" <mszick at goquest dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:36:56 -0800
Subject: Re: GCC Infrastructure File
References: <03030316505703.01053@wolf466> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0303211032150.26178@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <3E7ADDED.7050306@unitus.it> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0303211045481.26178@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 10:47:02AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> >> However, Janis, Mark, do we need this at all any longer?
> > IMHO, we still need some form of it, in the light of delightful ;)
> > reports like this one:
> >
> >     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-03/msg01174.html
> 
> I didn't mean to suggest not testing Pooma, but that we might not need
> a specific local version (because I believe mainline Pooma now has the
> problems fixed that made our local version necessary).

We need a pointer to some stable version for people who want to do
integration testing without worrying about whether the test software
is changing.

Janis

References:
- GCC Infrastructure File
  - From: Michael S . Zick
- Re: GCC Infrastructure File
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: GCC Infrastructure File
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: GCC Infrastructure File
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]