This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)

From: Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>
To: Ross Smith <r-smith at ihug dot co dot nz>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 10:41:13 -0800
Subject: Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)

On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 09:31 AM, Ross Smith wrote:

Could you be more specific please? Reading 14.5.5 (function templates)
and 14.7.1 (implicit instantiation) turns up nothing relevant, as far
as I can see. 3.2 (one definition rule) para 3 says "Every program
shall contain exactly one definition of every non-inline function or
object that is used in that program", which seems pretty clear to me.

Function templates aren't functions.

--Matt

References:
- Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
  - From: Ross Smith

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]