This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Speed discussion ...
- From: Karel Gardas <kgardas at objectsecurity dot com>
- To: Lars Segerlund <lars dot segerlund at comsys dot se>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:27:42 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: Speed discussion ...
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Lars Segerlund wrote:
>
> Hi , I have been asking around and it seem's that gcc is about 15
> times slower than borland ( I have asked three people with real projects
> on linux-gcc/win-bcc and comparable hardware ), and no advantage when it
> comes to code quality.
>
> I haven't got anything consistent but it seem's from 'word of mouth'
> that gcc is about 10 times slower than most other compilers.
>
> I just wanted to inform about my little investigation, I will try to
> get more 'hard' data and testcases soon.
FYI: I have provided some simple timming of MICO build (C++ CORBA impl.)
for gcc2.95.4, gcc3.2.2, icc7 and como4.3.0.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-03/msg00490.html
Cheers,
Karel
--
Karel Gardas kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com