This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: dewar at gnat dot com, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
- Cc: aoliva at redhat dot com, bernds at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,geoffk at geoffk dot org, jbuck at synopsys dot com
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 22:16:49 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: -fobey-inline (was Re: gcc and inlining)
> I agree with that. But that is not an argument to ignore the inline
> implied by in-class function definition: That is part of common C++
> styles of writing programs.
Well it might be. if typically this implicit inlining causes programs to
slow down by excessive inlining, then the compiler is probably choosing
wrong defaults.