This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.3

From: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:58:50 -0800
Subject: Re: GCC 3.3
References: <1047455175.3197.196.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> <200303121125.h2CBPHT14930@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>

On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 11:25:17AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > > ???> Go to Query, then look for high priority PRs that have "3.3" in the
> > > synopsis.  How much easier can it be?  Thanks to (mostly) Wolfgang,
> > > hi-pri PRs are now classified better than ever before!
> > 
> > Amazingly, I did not think of that.
> > 
> 
> Unfortunately, that misses out a few that are marked as regressions, but 
> aren't at high priority.  These are (if I've typed them in correctly):
> 
> Medium: 10024 9972 9848 9772 9594 9469 9311 8963 8960 7675 6162
> Low: 9163 5975
> 
> In addition there are several PRs which refer to 3.3 but are not marked as 
> regressions.

The right thing to do is to mark these as high priority and to put
the standard prefix in the Synopsis line.  I'll make a pass at this if
no one else has, but I'd want to confirm that these are still issues,
and, thanks to continued problems with subversions.gcc.org, I can't
update from CVS ("waiting for anoncvs's lock in /cvsroot/gcc/gcc" forever).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 3.3
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: GCC 3.3
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 3.3
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]