This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc gcc-3_3-branch has configure.in newer than configure
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 08:08:58 +0100
- Subject: Re: gcc gcc-3_3-branch has configure.in newer than configure
- References: <200303110646.h2B6kD117896@duracef.shout.net>
Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net> writes:
> In the gcc 3.3 branch, several people have committed changes to
> the top-level configure.in without regenerating the top-level configure.
>
> [mgnu at berman gcc]$ ls -l configure configure.in
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 mgnu mgnu 49628 Sep 29 12:11 configure
> -rw-r--r-- 1 mgnu mgnu 52656 Nov 28 15:27 configure.in
>
> Is this normal? It seems strange to me.
The 3.3 top level configure script is not generated by autoconf. It
is a cygnus-style configure script and therefore this looks fine.
>
> In particular, 'configure.in' has code to set gxx_include_dir,
> but 'configure' has not been regenerated to use that code.
That's a problem in itself.
Note that mainline has an autoconf generated configure script and in
mainline this situation should not happen,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj at suse dot de
private aj at arthur dot inka dot de
http://www.suse.de/~aj