This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x

From: Petko Manolov <petkan at users dot sourceforge dot net>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:31:09 +0200 (EET)
Subject: Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x
References: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0303101311280.389-100000@tequila.rakia.org><hoof4jigpy.fsf@byrd.suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.50.0303101412410.389-100000@tequila.rakia.org><ho3clvif3u.fsf@byrd.suse.de>

> The ISO C standard defines printf and allows this behaviour for all
> functions that are part of the standard.

Oh, i see now.

> Free-standing means basically you have no C Library and therefore gcc
> will not do such optimizations,

That is good enough for me.  I'm using no C library for this
particular project so the option should do.


cheers,
Petko

Follow-Ups:
- Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x
  - From: Falk Hueffner

References:
- printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x
  - From: Petko Manolov
- Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x
  - From: Petko Manolov
- Re: printf optimiziation in gcc-3.2.x
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]