This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
- From: Biagio Lucini <lucini at thphys dot ox dot ac dot uk>
- To: Lars Segerlund <lars dot segerlund at comsys dot se>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:09:17 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?
- References: <3E5E99B5.8000705@maad.com> <200302280358.WAA25372@caip.rutgers.edu><3E67EEAA.7090202@maad.com> <3E67FF7D.2000909@iprimus.com.au><3E687D09.7000201@comsys.se>
Could you give me an example of a fast compiler? My only term of
comparison is the Intel one, and with it it takes ages to compile the most
trivial program.
Biagio
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Lars Segerlund wrote:
>
> I like gcc, however I think this pinpoints the problem of using it for
> real software developement, it's painfully slow and getting slower all
> the time. When I get some time I will also look if I can give some help
> in making it faster, however this is a problem since people are starting
> to abandon gcc, ( for everything exept trivial stuff ).
>
> Gcc would need a 50 % speedup in this case to be deemed usefull, and I
> believe a speedup of 100%-200% would be necessary in order to put it on
> par with most other compilers.
>
> I just want to point out this in retrospect of the previous discussion
> about compilation speed as a real issue, not to restart the debate.
>
> / Lars Segerlund.
>