This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] coding style for structure fields


In message <1046706013 dot 29022 dot 11 dot camel at tornado> , Diego Novillo writes:
 >I think I'm getting sick of this.  I see two problems:
Can't blame you.  I'm not a big fan of the inline accessor functions :-)


 >I realize that these stylistic issues are highly subjective, but I'd
 >like to get an idea of what other folks think.  Should we move inline
 >with the rest of GCC and use lvalue-macros?  Should we maintain the
 >current get/set inline macros?
I would recommend you use the schemes used elsewhere in GCC, namely
lvalue macros.

jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]