This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
- From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- To: bcollins at debian dot org
- Cc: doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:21:21 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria
- References: <200302232354.SAA19348@caip.rutgers.edu> <1046140774.11789.236.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> <15963.4024.617575.763533@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <200302251618.LAA25252@caip.rutgers.edu> <15963.41658.352756.410149@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <200303011555.KAA22373@caip.rutgers.edu> <20030301160425.GT2896@phunnypharm.org>
> From: Ben Collins <bcollins at debian dot org>
>
> > Thanks Matthias, but seeing your patch two things occur to me:
> >
> > One is we don't have a "tester" for x86 Debian (of any version), would
> > you like to volunteer to be it?
> >
> > Second, the "tester" for sparc Debian is Ben Collins and it's not
> > clear if he plans to use 3.0 or if he remains committed to testing at
> > all. I quick search of the testsuite results list shows no postings
> > by him, but I think we should check before proceeding. (I've CC:ed
> > him on this message, hopefully he'll respond.)
> >
> > If no one steps forward to actually test sparc Debian, I suggest we
> > recruit a "tester" and/or find another linux-gnu target since there
> > are many sparc postings from others who are actively testing.
>
> I am current testing gcc-3.x. I've not discovered many problems that
> weren't already discovered (I'm admittedly a little slower than other
> testers).
Thanks for responding, however that was a little vague. For the
purposes of these release criteria, what I'd like to clarify is:
1. Will you specifically commit to testing gcc-3.3 on Debian?
2. Will you be able to post regular testsuite results?
3. Which version of Debian will you be using on sparc (2.2 or 3.0) ?
Thanks,
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu