This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrom make check*
- From: Tim Josling <tej at melbpc dot org dot au>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 22:24:53 +1100
- Subject: Re: At last: the bool problem seems to be due to omitted dependencyfrom make check*
- Organization: Melbourne PC User Group
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0303011046270.8380-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>
The problem I had in this case was that the system cc didn't like -fstats so
it failed. To me, the stdbool only seems to solve part of the problem, which
is that suddenly we are building part of the compiler with a wrong compiler.
How would this work with C++?
Tim Josling
"Joseph S. Myers" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Tim Josling wrote:
>
> > File toplev.c gets recompiled with a different size definition of bool than
>
> I have previously suggested
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-09/msg00797.html> that we should avoid
> this problem simply by not using the system <stdbool.h>.
>
> --
> Joseph S. Myers
> jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk