This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bugzilla
- From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, dberlin at dberlin dot org
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 04:00:35 -0500
- Subject: Re: Bugzilla
>> (Am I wrong?) What will happen
>>to the exceedingly useful 'class'?
>I can throw it into the keywords field automatically if you like, but
>it'll be a few days to get it right.
That would be fine. Some suggestions on the keyword conversion:
* wrong-code, ice-on-legal-code, ice-on-illegal-code, rejects-legal, and
accepts-illegal should become keywords. This information *needs* to be
kept, not dropped.
* pessimizes-code should probably become a keyword too, though I couuld
be convinced otherwise.
* sw-bug should be dropped; it's the catch-all category for
unclassified PRs.
* duplicate should really map to whatever Bugzilla uses for duplicate
tracking.
* doc-bug could map to a 'documentation' component, or be a keyword; I'm
not sure which would be better.
* change-request should map to a severity, I believe.
* I have no idea about 'support' or 'mistaken', since I haven't figured
out what they're used for.
Thanks for your hard work!
--Nathanael