This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 3.3 target date?

From: "Svein E. Seldal" <Svein dot Seldal at solidas dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>, David Rasmussen <pinkfloydhomer at yahoo dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:06:37 +0100
Subject: Re: 3.3 target date?
References: <20030218094934.16458.qmail@web40805.mail.yahoo.com> <3E524BB1.2050402@unitus.it> <1045586849.1915.23.camel@steven> <hoheb0tzym.fsf@byrd.suse.de> <Pine.BSF.4.51.0302191014020.44661@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

That's interesting, because we still have 77 regressions in 3.3 listed
in GNATS:

Hmm. I've committed a PR (PR/9387) for the gcc-3.3. And I see now that I've failed to mark the synopsis correctly, so it fails your search. (And I was uncertain about marking this as a high or a medium bug, so I marked it as medium.) -- Maybe thats why nobody have looked at it yet....

Maybe someone should evaluate the PR and at least give it a correct status and priority...

Thanks,
Svein Seldal

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3.3 target date?
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

References:
- 3.3 target date?
  - From: David Rasmussen
- Re: 3.3 target date?
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: 3.3 target date?
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: 3.3 target date?
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: 3.3 target date?
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]