This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: vrp?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: law at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:57:19 -0800
Subject: Re: vrp?
References: <200302121919.h1CJJ9kL012814@localhost.redhat.com> <200302121951.OAA27466@makai.watson.ibm.com>

On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:51:09PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> 	CSE is the only pass which uses address_cost to try to compute the
> best address forms, so be careful what you consider disabling.

Only the bits that attempt to propagate data between blocks.

I'd hoped that Roger Sayle's recent gcse patch would make the
cse code completely redundant, but (as obvious from the first
post in this thread) it's not quite there.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: vrp?
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Re: vrp?
  - From: law
- Re: vrp?
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]