This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER

From: Michael S. Zick <mszick at goquest dot com>
To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>,Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 20:18:23 -0600
Subject: Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
References: <78552F78-3D30-11D7-A4D8-003065A77310@apple.com> <20030210205830.GC17757@daikokuya.co.uk> <3E482133.5080407@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>

On Monday 10 February 2003 04:01 pm, Toon Moene wrote:
> Phil Edwards wrote:-
>
> >For speeding up compilation times?  What changes would they make in such
> >a fork that couldn't be made in the mainline compiler?
>
> Well, let's face it: It's easier to fork gcc than to rewrite Linux in
> Fortran, where they wouldn't have the slow-compile-problem.
>
> :-)
Linux in Fortran...  Love It!
Just the sort of thing I should have thought of myself.
Mike

Hmm... 
Now where did I put that compiler Signetics wrote in Fortran...
Perhaps on the 8 inch floppys...

References:
- Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER
  - From: Toon Moene

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]