This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Dan Nicolaescu <dann at ics dot uci dot edu>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:00:02 -0500
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)

On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 03:36  PM, Diego Novillo wrote:

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Dan Nicolaescu wrote:

One more difference between the code generated by the tree-ssa
compiler: it inlines fewer mem* functions.

Yes, because the estimate that relates number of trees to number
of RTL insns is wrong for GIMPLE.  Dan Berlin mentioned that he
wanted to increase it, I don't know if he ever got around to
doing it.

No, not yet.
I can do it when i get home.

Dan, if you want to test before then, simply change INSNS_PER_STMT in tree-inline.c to 3, rather than 10.

The actual average insns per GIMPLE statement was 3.something or other over all the code i ran a statistic gatherer through.

Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]