This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Comparison of gcc 3.2.1 and gcc 3.2.2-20030203 with gdb
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:53:26 -0800
- Subject: Re: Comparison of gcc 3.2.1 and gcc 3.2.2-20030203 with gdb
- References: <200302061853.h16IrNh29708@duracef.shout.net>
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:53:23PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> I'll start posting regularly to gcc-testresults. I can file bug
> reports, too, when gcc does something that makes the gdb results
> regress. Naturally that is a delicate area because when gcc+gdb do not
> work together the fault could be on either side, or both sides.
>
> I'm tracking gcc-3_2-branch, gcc-3_3-branch, and HEAD (I'm about to
> stop tracking gcc-3_2-branch). I do a spin every 4-10 days.
Please consider adding an entry about your testing to the "Current
Efforts" list in http://gcc.gnu.org/testing/index.html. In CVS, that
page is wwwdocs/htdocs/testing/index.html. Mention which platform
you're testing.
Janis