This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: 03 Feb 2003 13:32:38 -0700
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4
- References: <200301312121.QAA22864@makai.watson.ibm.com>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "David" == David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> writes:
David> Instead of the development plan being driven solely by dates, I
David> would like to see some technology goals. For instance, we want
David> to merge in 3.4-bib, itanium-branch, pch-branch, rtlopt-branch,
David> and new-regalloc. We allow those branches in plan to be merged
David> after Stage 1 and after the GCC 3.3 release, if necessary.
David> That's controlled instability, as opposed to considering any
David> major patch far into the GCC 3.4 development cycle. We don't
David> want a deluge of patches right after the GCC 3.3 release, but
David> we also shouldn't make it so hard for developers.
This sounds good to me. What's the next step? Maybe suggest a patch
to the development plan?
Tom