This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Warnings for unhandled c++ exceptions?
Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:
| On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 08:37:00PM +0100, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
| > Because I was reading the C++ FAQ LITE yesterday. :-)
| > I thought his definitions were apt.
| > They are strong words though; maybe I should drop them.
|
| The FSF and RMS have some psychological hangup with calling code "legal" or
| "illegal". (My own opinion is that, as long as the ISO language standard
| uses it, RMS can take a leap.)
C++ definition does not use such strong words. Rather, it speaks of
"well-formed"/"ill-formed" program constructs.
-- Gaby