This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: regression hunt status, question about reports to mailing list

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: "rodrigc at attbi dot com" <rodrigc at attbi dot com>, "bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu" <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 20:39:46 -0800
Subject: Re: regression hunt status, question about reports to mailing list

--On Friday, December 20, 2002 09:14:45 AM -0800 Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com> wrote:

Should I continue to send mail to gcc@gcc.gnu.org when I identify the
patch that caused a regression or that fixed a mainline regression that
still exists on a release branch?  This seemed like a good idea when
there was one every couple of days, but I'm continuing to discover
short-cuts that make it faster and easier, so the trickle of mail might
be getting large enough to be annoying (I've got three more almost ready
to report this morning).

I think what you're doing is tremendously useful.  I'd just like you to
keep doing it. :-)

--
Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: regression hunt status, question about reports to mailing list
  - From: Tom Lord

References:
- regression hunt status, question about reports to mailing list
  - From: Janis Johnson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]