This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: outdated comment in sched-rgn.c or bug in find_basic_blocks ?

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at superh dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:33:22 +0100
Subject: Re: outdated comment in sched-rgn.c or bug in find_basic_blocks ?
References: <3E009505.F9151352@superh.com> <20021219094630.GG16671@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <3E020EC6.BE543C6E@superh.com> <20021219232317.GJ23391@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <3E0256DD.A99164CB@superh.com>

> Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > This looks fine to me.  Perhaps we don't need to reffer to loop as loop
> > is just temporary problem (I hope), instead we can mention that
> > scheduler runs after the profile has been constructed or something like
> > that.
> 	
> Ok, next attempt:

Now it is even more fine :) Thanks!

Honza

References:
- outdated comment in sched-rgn.c or bug in find_basic_blocks ?
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- Re: outdated comment in sched-rgn.c or bug in find_basic_blocks ?
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: outdated comment in sched-rgn.c or bug in find_basic_blocks ?
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- Re: outdated comment in sched-rgn.c or bug in find_basic_blocks ?
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: outdated comment in sched-rgn.c or bug in find_basic_blocks ?
  - From: Joern Rennecke

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]