This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is linkonce underused?

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Jim Wilson <wilson at redhat dot com>
Cc: Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:51:25 +0100
Subject: Re: Is linkonce underused?
References: <5F5060D0-1207-11D7-BD76-000393B2ABA2@apple.com> <xwu7ke8jmve.fsf@tonopah.toronto.redhat.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 05:34:29PM -0500, Jim Wilson wrote:
> There is support in the assembler for putting IA-64 EH info into linkonce
> sections.  I don't know if anyone has thought about putting the dwarf2 CFI
> based EH info into linkonce sections.

Recent binutils linker throws away EH frame FDEs/CIEs against removed sections
and does other optimizations on .eh_frame too.

	Jakub

References:
- Is linkonce underused?
  - From: Matt Austern
- Re: Is linkonce underused?
  - From: Jim Wilson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]