This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: libstdc++ multilib configury broken in CVS head


DJ Delorie wrote:
>It looks like it should run config-ml.in (which is where that message
>comes from).  Try "sh -vx configure ..."  and see if it does.

Indeed, config-ml.in does not run.  And the reason is ...

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>It's probaby the --enable-debug patch. I did some cleanups to
>libstdc++-v3/configure.in WRT multilibs.
[snip]
>! [test -z "$CONFIG_HEADERS" || echo timestamp > stamp-h
>! if test -n "$CONFIG_FILES"; then
>!  if test -n "${with_build_subdir}" || test -n "${with_target_subdir}"; then
>!     LD="${ORIGINAL_LD_FOR_MULTILIBS}"
>!     ac_file=Makefile . ${glibcpp_basedir}/../config-ml.in

... that with_build_subdir and with_target_subdir are used
but not defined here.

Comparing with the setup in the working target library
configure.in files, it would appear that something like
this should fix the problem:

Index: libstdc++-v3/configure.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.111
diff -c -p -r1.111 configure.in
*** libstdc++-v3/configure.in   16 Dec 2002 19:01:55 -0000      1.111
--- libstdc++-v3/configure.in   17 Dec 2002 21:02:03 -0000
*************** chmod +x testsuite_flags
*** 489,494 ****
--- 489,496 ----
  srcdir=${srcdir}
  host=${host}
  target=${target}
+ with_target_subdir=${with_target_subdir}
+ with_build_subdir=${with_build_subdir}
  with_multisubdir=${with_multisubdir}
  ac_configure_args="${multilib_arg} ${ac_configure_args}"
  CONFIG_SHELL=${CONFIG_SHELL-/bin/sh}

I'm currently running a multilibbed bootstrap/regtest on 
s390x-ibm-linux with this change; OK to commit if this 
goes through?

B.t.w. I'm unable to regenerate an unchanged libstdc++
'configure' file.  Which autoconf version was used to
generate it?  Apparently not the same that is used for
the rest of gcc (e.g. the --site-file stuff is missing).

Thanks,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  weigand@informatik.uni-erlangen.de


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]