This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GNATS policy question
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Volker Reichelt <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>
- Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 08:22:33 -0800
- Subject: Re: GNATS policy question
Low priority sounds good to me.
Three final questions:
* Should we add "[error-recovery]" to the synopsis line so that one does
not stumble over those bugs over and over again?
No; I think that will get too crowded. But a note in the audit trail
would be nice.
* Shall I prepare a patch for the policies section of gnatswrite.html
to document the procedure?
Yes, please.
* There are some bugs in GNATS that were closed because a "confused by
earlier ..." message was issued. Shall I reopen them?
No, it's really not worth spending that much effort on this class of
bugs. Once we never, ever silently generate bad code we can worry much
more about these kinds of things... :-)
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com