This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Saga of m68k PIC continues

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Peter Barada <pbarada at mail dot wm dot sps dot mot dot com>
Cc: jh at suse dot cz, Peter dot Barada at motorola dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 14:34:17 -0800
Subject: Re: Saga of m68k PIC continues
References: <200212112045.gBBKjnQ13223@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com> <20021211235940.GF6975@redhat.com> <200212120011.gBC0B5W08189@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com> <200212122025.gBCKPd819055@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com> <20021212202844.GJ15490@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <200212122039.gBCKdf519120@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com> <20021212204443.GK15490@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <200212122139.gBCLdPm20043@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com>

On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 04:39:25PM -0500, Peter Barada wrote:
> While looking at the PIC code, I'm wondering if there is a way to
> suppress setting up the global_table register if:
> 
> 1) the funciton is static
> 2) the function's address is not taken
> 3) the function is a leaf.

Would be very nice, no?  Too bad we don't have (2).

Other ports want this as well...



r~

References:
- Re: Saga of m68k PIC continues
  - From: Peter Barada
- Re: Saga of m68k PIC continues
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Saga of m68k PIC continues
  - From: Peter Barada
- Re: Saga of m68k PIC continues
  - From: Peter Barada
- Re: Saga of m68k PIC continues
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Saga of m68k PIC continues
  - From: Peter Barada
- Re: Saga of m68k PIC continues
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Saga of m68k PIC continues
  - From: Peter Barada

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]