This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Troubles building gcc-3.2.1 --target=m68k-linux

From: Peter Barada <pbarada at mail dot wm dot sps dot mot dot com>
To: schwab at suse dot de
Cc: Peter dot Barada at motorola dot com, wilson at redhat dot com, Peter dot Barada at motorola dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:16:46 -0500
Subject: Re: Troubles building gcc-3.2.1 --target=m68k-linux
References: <200212101727.gBAHRC107486@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com><xwu3cp5eox5.fsf@tonopah.toronto.redhat.com><200212101817.gBAIHtx07901@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com> <jeel8phc6m.fsf@sykes.suse.de>

>|> What I'm *more* concerned (at the moment) is why as a macro
>|> GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS works, but as a function it fails....
>
>Because you only have one version, but all those macros ultimatively
>depend on REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_P and REG_OK_FOR_BASE_P, and those differ
>between REG_OK_STRICT and !REG_OK_STRICT.

Duh.

Since I only saw one definition of GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS, I thought
it was invariant.  Obviously that's wrong.

-- 
Peter Barada                                   Peter.Barada@motorola.com
Wizard                                         781-852-2768 (direct)
WaveMark Solutions(wholly owned by Motorola)   781-270-0193 (fax)

References:
- Troubles building gcc-3.2.1 --target=m68k-linux
  - From: Peter Barada
- Re: Troubles building gcc-3.2.1 --target=m68k-linux
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: Troubles building gcc-3.2.1 --target=m68k-linux
  - From: Peter Barada
- Re: Troubles building gcc-3.2.1 --target=m68k-linux
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]