This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
PATCH for Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:37:25 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: PATCH for Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
- References: <6190000.1039400391@localhost>
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> What should I add to our new section on "Procedures and Policies" at
>> the end of http://gcc.gnu.org/gnatswrite.html ? Mark?
> I think 3 months is fine; please add that.
Thanks, I'll commit the following, once gcc.gnu.org is up and working
again.
Gerald
PS: I'll be offline starting tomorrow for most of the following two weeks;
would you mind committing this for me if the downtime takes longer, Janis?
*** gnatswrite.html.orig Mon Dec 9 14:37:03 2002
--- gnatswrite.html Mon Dec 9 09:27:51 2002
*************** version of GCC is released.</p>
*** 95,100 ****
--- 95,103 ----
<h2>Procedures and Policies</h2>
+ <p><strong>Bugs in state "feedback"</strong> that have not received any
+ response for three months can be closed.</p>
+
<p><strong>Bugs in category "bootstrap"</strong> that refer to older
releases or snapshots/CVS versions should be put into state "feedback",
asking the reporter whether she can still reproduce the problem and to