This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Obsolete installation instructions and inconvenient CVS HOWTO
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Reichelt <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:15:51 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: Obsolete installation instructions and inconvenient CVS HOWTO
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Reichelt wrote:
> first, the information on the web page
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
> is a a little bit obsolete. From a recent discussion with DJ Delorie:
>
> Me:
>>> According to the fifth paragraph of
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
>>> this is not supported:
>>>
>>> First, in general, GCC must be built into a separate directory than
>>> the sources which does not reside within the source tree. This is
>>> how
>>> almost all developers build GCC; building where srcdir == objdir is
>>> completely unsupported; building where objdir is a subdirectory of
>>> srcdir is completely unsupported.
>>>
>>> Or did I miss something?
>
> DJ Delorie:
>> That document is obsolete. In the 3.1 documentation it states this:
>>
>> "First, we @strong{highly} recommend that GCC be built into a
>> separate directory than the sources which does @strong{not} reside
>> within the source tree. This is how we generally build GCC;
>> building where @var{srcdir} == @var{objdir} should still work, but
>> doesn't get extensive testing; building where @var{objdir} is a
>> subdirectory of @var{srcdir} is unsupported."
>>
>> The current documentation says pretty much the same thing.
I raised this issue back in June,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-06/threads.html#01664
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-07/threads.html#00019
DJ, it seems something like
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2002-04/msg00764.html
should be applied to mainline as well? If you agree, would you mind
doing that (or would you prefer me doing it)?
Gerald