This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 08:11:09AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:15:22PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >> This also happens on a i686-pc-linux-gnu gcc 3.3,
> >> but does not happen on a i686-pc-linux-gnu gcc 3.1.1
> >> so it is a regression report it to the bug system, please.
> >>
> >> 3.3's version:
> >> gcc version 3.3 20021023 (experimental)
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I did. I sent email to gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
>
> Did you file it with gnats to our bug database? An email sent to
> gcc-bugs will be lost, it really needs to be in the database. Use
> gccbug or the web interface to gnats to file the report,
>
Man, the gnatsweb interface real sucks. After 6 hours
of reducing a rather complex chuck of code to 10 lines.
I had to try 4 times to get a report filed.
Why offer a priority field of "high" if it can't be
set? Why have a submitter-id field when only a
single choice is validate? Why ask for the release
info when you also ask for the output of gcc -v?
Look for a PR with the same subject line. The
GNATS system hasn't registered my PR, yet.
--
Steve