Re: abysmal code generated by gcc 3.2

[Kurt Garloff <garloff at suse dot de>]

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:51:47AM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> 
> > >> uh? except for max-inline-insns, I never heard of the others.  Are
> > >> these new (and what do they mean? - is that maybe documented in CVS).
> > >
> > > I'll assume all of these are documented in the manual,
> >
> > No, they are not.  Perhaps the patch that added them
> >
> > 2002-04-27  Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
> >
> >          * tree-inline.c (inlinable_function_p): Improve heuristics
> >          by using a smoother function to cut down allowable inlinable
> > size.
> >          * param.def: Add parameters max-inline-insns-single,
> >          max-inline-slope, min-inline-insns that determine the exact
> >          shape of the above function.
> >          * param.h: Likewise.
> >
> > should be reverted until this is fixed.
> 
> A little bit too harsh I would say.  The documentation (which Kurt wrote)
> just wasn't committed for some reason (I believe another person than Kurt
> actually committed the patch on Kurt's behalf).

This reminds me I should finally take care of splitting the rest of my
pending patches and submit the ones containing the documentation.

Sorry,
-- 
Kurt Garloff  <garloff@suse.de>                          Eindhoven, NL
GPG key: See mail header, key servers                        SuSE Labs
SuSE Linux AG, Nuernberg, DE                            SCSI, Security

Attachment: msg01313/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature