This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[3.2] Reconsider patches for bison 1.50?
- From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: mark at codesourcery dot com, debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
- Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 14:41:01 -0700
- Subject: [3.2] Reconsider patches for bison 1.50?
This is a quote from the Debian package changelog for gcc 3.2:
* FTBS: With the switch to bison-1.50 (and 1.75), gcc-3.2 fails to build from
source on Debian unstable systems. This is fixed in gcc HEAD, but not on
the current release branch.
HELP NEEDED:
- check what is missing from the patches in debian/patches/bison.dpatch.
This is a backport of the bison related patches, but showing regressions
in the gcc testsuite, so it cannot be applied.
- build gcc using byacc (bootstrap currently fails using byacc).
- build bison-1.35 in it's own package (the current 1.35-3 package fails
to build form source).
- and finally ask upstream to backport the patch to the branch. It's not
helpful not beeing able to follow the stable branch. Maybe we should
just switch to gcc HEAD as BSD does ...
As a terrible workaround, build the sources from CVS first on a machine,
with bison-1.35 installed, then package the tarball, so the bison
generated files are not rebuilt.
I think we should reconsider not backporting the patches for bison 1.50
to the 3.2 branch.
zw