This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Bootstrap times on mainline are getting worse


I've been collecting bootstrap times for gcc HEAD on i386-unknown-freebsd4.5 
on an Athlon 1000 for 3 months now. You can find the plot a 
http://www.globe-tec.de/~ritzert/gcc.png . The first plot is the user time as 
reported by 'make bootstrap', excluding 'make gnatlib_and_tools'. The second 
dataset is the time it takes to compile STLport 4.5.3 on the same machine. I 
do also have the object sizes recorded in case somebody cares.

As a short summary, bootstrap time has gone up from around 4150 seconds on 
05/07 to ca. 4700s today.
The compile time for STLport is about the same as at the beginning of July, 
but went up and down 10% respectively in between (the periods without crosses 
mark failures to build STLport, the current one being caused by 
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-10/msg00846.html ).

Michael


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]