This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: 3.2 and 3.3 release questions
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- To: "BONNER,MATT (HP-Vancouver,ex1)" <matt_bonner at hp dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gnu dot org, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 21:50:47 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: RE: 3.2 and 3.3 release questions
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, BONNER,MATT (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
> Thanks for the fast response!
Well, it took a bit longer this time. :-/
> Thank you for updating the web page, it looks fine now. If you
> want a nitpick, the text in footnote 1 should read "Note that no
> distinction is made between patches that are themselves buggy
> and patches that expose latent bugs elsewhere in the compiler."
Thanks for the note and the more detailed explanation (on "which"
versus "that")! I'll shortly apply the patch you'll find at the
end of this message.
> Thank you also for the information on the ABI for 3.2.x and 3.3.x.
> Can you point me to any document that talks about the details of
> the changes?
Unfortunately we don't have such a document yet(?), though I agree
it would be nice to have one.
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/develop.html,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -3 -p -r1.20 develop.html
--- develop.html 5 Oct 2002 10:41:24 -0000 1.20
+++ develop.html 14 Oct 2002 19:48:28 -0000
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ stages of development, branch points, an
<p id="one"> Note that no distinction is made between patches which are
-themselves buggy and patches which expose "latent" bugs elsewhere in
+themselves buggy and patches that expose latent bugs elsewhere in
<p id="two"> The Steering Committee is planning to prepare a list of such