This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Testsuite reorganization, documentation, cleanup?
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:19:46AM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote:
> Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> >On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >>On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 02:58:17PM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote:
> >>>I don't like this level of subdivision very much. It's needed for
> >>>torture tests because they don't have any info internal to the file,
> >>>but in general I think test instructions instructions for a file should
> >>>be in the file, not implicit in some detail of its pathname.
> >Why not? What's wrong with having a directory where different
> >optimization options are iterated over, with the exact option
> >not explicitly stated in the file? It's quite convenient IMHO.
> >If there's a future -O0.5 option, it can be added to the
> That's why I said "in general". The current torture test structure
> is very efficient for the purpose it serves, and I don't see much
> need to change it, although it would be very useful to document it more.
...soooo, how about someone approving my first doc cleanup patch (v3)
...or explaining why it's no good?