This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
- From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
- To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>,Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:56:57 +0100
- Subject: Re: Bug tracking / Release Quality Assurance
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210080621170.3843-100000@www.eyesopen.com>
Roger Sayle wrote:-
> date all boot c&++ c++ dbug g77 java lgcj mid objc opt othr stdc targ
> 20020430 1256 126 591 471 12 10 77 46 16 15 85 86 45 102
> 20020502 1262 127 596 478 11 11 78 44 16 15 86 86 42 102
> 20020508 1288 129 605 482 12 11 75 45 18 15 87 87 45 102
> 20020514 1301 130 606 483 12 9 75 46 19 15 94 91 49 104
> 20020519 1320 129 620 496 12 9 76 46 19 13 97 89 48 107
> 20020523 1355 134 623 499 12 10 77 48 19 13 102 93 58 109
> 20020527 1383 139 638 505 12 10 81 49 18 13 107 95 55 108
> 20020601 1418 143 656 512 12 10 80 49 18 13 114 98 50 113
> 20020607 1451 148 658 510 12 10 79 49 20 18 118 101 48 120
> 20020612 1475 148 668 518 12 10 77 49 21 18 128 102 50 121
> 20020616 1502 157 677 520 12 10 77 49 23 17 132 88 52 133
> 20020626 1504 157 694 536 14 11 81 51 22 17 133 91 56 103
> 20020702 1519 164 696 537 14 11 80 49 22 16 140 91 60 104
> 20020721 1591 169 720 538 18 12 84 49 29 11 150 98 61 113
> 20020802 1640 173 741 553 18 13 84 50 29 11 156 100 58 122
> 20020826 1787 189 783 610 24 15 84 56 47 11 176 110 60 154
> 20020908 1885 198 838 652 24 15 90 60 48 9 178 116 67 160
> 20020928 1940 214 829 644 26 15 91 58 55 5 186 122 79 170
> 20021005 1908 217 828 644 29 14 91 60 53 5 175 124 77 156
>
> As you can see with the exception of the hard work of Nicola Pero (and
> Stan Shebs?) to bring down the objc numbers most other columns are out
> of control. But notice also the recent effects of Mark Mitchell's
> requests to fix bugs (or threats to close branches) has resulted in
> the first significant drop in the total number of PRs in 6 months.
You omitted "preprocessor"; there's only 3 of those!
Neil.