This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86


Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:

| On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 08:52:11PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:
| > 
| > | On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 04:14:05PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
| > | > On Fri, 04 Oct 2002, Zack Weinberg wrote:
| > | > > I'm now getting this failure too.  If no one beats me to it I will
| > | > > have a look eventually; however, I want to concentrate on regression
| > | > > fixes in 3.2 and 3.3 for the moment.
| > | > > 
| > | > I hadn't built b-i-b before, but since I didn't get this failure
| > | > on mainline, maybe this could be cured by another merge.
| > | 
| > | I'll try that after the current libstdc++ build failure in mainline
| > | gets addressed.
| > 
| > More accurately, it is the front-end that is broken.  We need approval
| > from another global-write privs maintainer to back out Mark's recent
| > patch. 
| 
| I know.  The point is that it would be silly to do a merge now and
| propagate the problem to another branch.

I'm not suggesting a silly merge; my point is that the problem isn't a
libstdc++ build failure: It is a badly broken cc1plus problem.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]