This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: xfail gcc.dg test

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 01:08:51 -0700
Subject: Re: xfail gcc.dg test
References: <20021004122437.W25369@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20021004052846.GA13321@redhat.com> <20021004155335.Z25369@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 03:53:35PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> and I can see solid reasons to keep gcc support and the assembly
> languages as close as possible.

True, but we've also got a solid reason to change.  The 
single leading dot infringes on traditional ELF namespace
in a way that doesn't happen for xcoff.

r~

References:
- xfail gcc.dg test
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: xfail gcc.dg test
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: xfail gcc.dg test
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]