This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bad hoist

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:25:37 -0700
Subject: Re: bad hoist
References: <20020926.160111.71163232.davem@redhat.com> <20020926.165552.00450493.davem@redhat.com> <20020927001944.GG17927@redhat.com> <20020926.173939.107288574.davem@redhat.com>

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 05:39:39PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Actually, LCT_CONST means no memory referenced, so the hoisting code
> is fine.

Well, kinda.  Argument memory is sort of a special case.  Thus
the explicit references to the arguments from the call insn.


r~

References:
- bad hoist
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: bad hoist
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: bad hoist
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: bad hoist
  - From: David S. Miller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]