This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Use of build_binary_op
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 14:13:57 +0200, Pop Sébastian <pop@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:57:18AM +0100, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>> > - a gimple_expand_body() to optimize a function body and expand to RTL.
>>
>> I don't think we need to require GIMPLE form when we enter the tree
>> equivalent of rest_of_compilation; anything which simplify_expr can handle
>> should be fine. I agree that much of the stuff currently in c_expand_body
>> needs to move into a language-independent file.
>>
>
> Just a question about documentation:
> is the .fig format ok for writing graphic documentation for GCC?
Should be. (Jason installs xfig)
> If yes, then here is a call-graph for the C/C++ expand_body (tree to RTL translation).
> It is not complete but that's enough for getting the main idea of the
> control flow and the call graph.
Yep. I think that basically everything shown in this graph should move into
language-independent code.
Jason