This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Use of build_binary_op
Op do 26-09-2002, om 12:42 schreef Pop Sébastian:
> >
> > So we'd have:
> > - a build_* interface for building generic trees
> > (goes/stays in tree.*)
> I don't like this build_* interface since it has lot of constraints comming
> from parsers. I think we should define a new interface with a unique
> constraint: be generic.
Building things like constants etc, are very generic :-)
> > - a build_<lang>_* interface for language specific trees
> > (goes/stays in <lang>-tree.* and c-common.*).
> ok.
>
> > - a build_gimple_* interface for building GIMPLE stmt trees, that is,
> > expressions are *not* lowered here.
> I'd like build_generic_*
>
> > - a gimple_expand_* interface for lowering expressions in GIMPLE trees.
> maybe generic_expand_*
> or even generic_simplify_*
Yes, I wrote this mail before reading your "GENERIC -> GIMPLE"
suggestion.
Greetz
Steven