This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Use of build_binary_op


On 26 Sep 2002 12:23:47 +0200, Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> wrote:

> Op do 26-09-2002, om 11:28 schreef Jason Merrill:
>> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:40:51 +0200, Pop Sébastian <pop@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr> wrote:
>> > I think that we have to define an interface on both lowered and
>> > non lowered GIMPLE.
>> 
>> Why would they need to be different?
>
> Because it allows you to share the lowering pass among the front ends.

Why would having separate interfaces change that?  The bnw-simple lowering
pass is already language-independent.

> The front ends would only need to worry about language specific trees
> and their semantics.

Right, that's the idea.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]