This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Merging with bnw-simple
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 19:33:15 +0100
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Merging with bnw-simple
- References: <20020924140250.GA25658@tornado.toronto.redhat.com><20020924132823.K11578@redhat.com>
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:28:23 -0400, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com> wrote:
> dnovillo wrote:
>> Now that we have a working version of the re-designed tree IR, we
>> have to think about merging it with tree-ssa. [...]
>>
>> 1- Merge the changes into tree-ssa-branch directly. This will
>> likely break all the current tree optimizers and mudflap. [...]
>
> From the mudflap perspective, this is okay with me, as long as
> "-fdisable-simple -fmudflap" continues to work.
It doesn't at the moment (i.e on bnw-simple-branch), but it could.
Currently the C frontend genericizes its trees at the end of
finish_function, but this could be conditioned on flag_disable_simple.
Jason