Parse error with member templates

[Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>]

The following snippet fails to compile:
  struct X {
    template <class T> T* f()  { return (T*) 0; }
  };

  template <class T>
  int* g(T) {
    X x;
    return x.f<int>();
  }

What's happening is that the second line in g() is
falling afoul of the parse ambiguity described in
14.2p4 of the C++ Standard: if you've got a dependent
name and you access a member template, you have to
write ".template f" instead of just plain "f".

Trouble is, I think the compiler is being a little too
eager to apply that rule here.  The Standard says it
applies when "the postfix-expression or qualified-id
explicitly depends on a template-parameter", and I
don't see that that's the case here.

So, the usual two questions:
 (1) Is there a plausible argument that I'm wrong, and
     that this behavior is correct after all?
 (2) If not, is this a known bug?

			--Matt