This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: HPUX C++ ABI


> What do others think?

I think there should be some plan aimed at converging the HP C++ ABI and
the GNU C++ ABI. Then both ABI's could be well-described by some
external, vendor-neutral standard, which I thought was the whole point
of the IA64 C++ ABI. How HP and the gcc community should best update and
version their C++ ABI is still up in the air, and not convered by any
document or standard.

The alternative, suggested as death by a thousand HP-specific ABI hacks
for HPUX on IA64, increasingly seems to be a bad idea. This approach
seems best suited as small patches in their own tree: merging these
fixes into the GCC repository gives them no incentive to fix the
underlying issues in the HP compiler. There are already too many
HP-specific hacks in the runtime, for instance. I'm less and less
interested in putting more in.

-benjamin


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]