This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Use of VLA in struct in gcc-torture/execute/20020412-1.c

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>
Cc: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 16:07:27 -0700
Subject: Re: Use of VLA in struct in gcc-torture/execute/20020412-1.c
References: <200209080501.BAA23144@makai.watson.ibm.com> <200209081914.g88JE2sZ020274@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>

On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 03:14:02PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> Another question, what should FUNCTION_ARG do about arguments that have
> a zero size (e.g., an empty struct, another GCC extension)?

A _fixed_ size zero?  I think we're supposed to treat 
that as a struct of size one.  Look at x86 output to be sure.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Use of VLA in struct in gcc-torture/execute/20020412-1.c
  - From: Fergus Henderson
- Re: Use of VLA in struct in gcc-torture/execute/20020412-1.c
  - From: John David Anglin

References:
- Re: Use of VLA in struct in gcc-torture/execute/20020412-1.c
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: Use of VLA in struct in gcc-torture/execute/20020412-1.c
  - From: John David Anglin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]