Re: stage1 bootstrap failuer to build gcc.3.3: cppfiles.c:1168: error: parse error before ']' token etc.

[Christian Jönsson <christian at j-son dot org>]

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:57:32PM +0100, Neil Booth wrote:
> Christian J?nsson wrote:-
> 
> > FWIW, I can bootstrap gcc-3.2, but still the same problem with
> > gcc-3.3...
> > 
> > The problem:
> > 
> > stage1 compile with installed gcc-2.95.4 (debian prerelase) "works" on
> > cppfiles.c
> > 
> > Stage2 compile with stage1/gcc bails out on cppflies.c
> > 
> > (I had the wrong subject, it's stage2 of the bootstrap that fails)
> 
> You are the only person that has ever reported this.  I'm afraid
> you will need to investigate it yourself.

hmm, I just tried the recently release Aurora SPARC Linux build-0.32,
same thing there... I am really lost here. Is there something with my
config options that are, well, bad?

--enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld
--with-system-zlib --enable-long-long
--enable-languages=c,c++,f77,java,objc --enable-nls --enable-symvers
--without-x --without-included-gettext --disable-checking

or is it that the joining of the gcc and binutils trunk trees should
be done in an other fashion these days? I have these symlinks from the
gcc dir into the src dir of binutils:

bfd@
binutils@
gas@
gprof@
ld@
opcodes@

and these from the gcc/include dir into the binutil's src/include dir

aout@
bfdlink.h@
bin-bugs.h@
bout.h@
callback.h@
coff@
dis-asm.h@
elf@
filenames.h@
fopen-same.h@
ieee.h@
opcode@
progress.h@
remote-sim.h@

am I missing something that has changed here??

Cheers,

/ChJ